Prepared for: Executive Teams & Board Members
Executive summary
The challenge – public and third sector leaders face a triple squeeze: rising regulatory scrutiny, shrinking resources, and eroding public trust. Governance failures now carry existential risks—from legal censure to mission collapse.
The opportunity – proactive risk management is not just about compliance—it is a strategic lever to protect reputation, unlock funding, and future-proof delivery.
This paper provides:
- A practical framework to align governance with mission-critical priorities.
- Targeted actions for short- and mid-term resilience.
- Key questions to audit leadership capability and resourcing.
Governance is your strategic priority
The stakes have changed – “Governance failures cost more than fines—they cost public confidence. And once lost, it takes years to rebuild.” —National Audit Office (2023)
Regulatory pressures demanding immediate attention:
| Regulator | Critical Focus Areas |
|---|---|
| Charity Commission | Financial stewardship, safeguarding protocols, trustee accountability. |
| CQC/NMC/GMC | Workforce wellbeing, leadership oversight, equitable service delivery. |
| ICO | AI-driven decision risks, data breach response times, transparency demands. |
Failure to act = operational vulnerability, legal exposure, and donor/funder distrust.
A leadership framework: From compliance to competitive advantage
Short-Term (0–12 Months): Mitigate and Fortify
- Conduct a Regulatory Gap Audit
- Map risks to mission (e.g., safeguarding gaps, outdated EDI policies, ICO compliance).
- Toolkit Suggestion: Use the ICO’s AI Governance Checklist (2023) for tech-related risks.
- Board-Level Risk Appetite Review
- Does your leadership team understand the legal and ethical trade-offs in your strategy?
- Policy Simplification
- Replace jargon-heavy documents with clear escalation protocols staff actually use.
Mid-Term (1–3 Years): Embed & Innovate
- Integrate Risk into Strategic Planning
- Example: A London NHS Trust tied governance upgrades to funding eligibility, securing £2M in grants.
- Culture Overhaul
- Train leaders to spot silent risks (e.g., burnout-driven errors, whistleblower fears).
- Talent Pipeline
- Upskill teams in regulatory forecasting (not just compliance).
Resourcing: Smart investments for high impact
Executives often ask: “Do we need a risk officer or just a better dashboard?” There’s no one-size-fits-all—but resource decisions must be grounded in your organisation’s risk profile, complexity, and impact.
Key Questions:
Capacity – Do we have in-house legal/regulatory insight, or do we rely on reactive support?
Systems – Are our audit/compliance systems integrated with delivery functions—or siloed and underused?
Confidence – Can our leaders read, interpret, and act on risk data with confidence?
Options to consider:
Shared services: Pooled risk officers for smaller charities (e.g. NCVO’s Collaborative Governance Pilot).
Targeted partnerships: External counsel for high-stakes areas (e.g. AI procurement, workforce restructuring).
Leadership skills audit
Effective governance requires emotional intelligence and ethical reflexes as much as technical know-how. It requires three competencies:
Technical (e.g., interpreting ICO guidance).
Strategic (e.g., balancing risk vs. innovation).
Emotional (e.g., fostering psychological safety for whistleblowers).
| Competency Area | Current Confidence | Gaps Identified | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal & Regulatory Literacy | |||
| Ethical Risk Judgement | |||
| Psychological Safety Practices | |||
| Data & AI Governance | |||
| EDI Compliance & Insight |
→ Use the checklist below to self-assess:
Can we explain our risk appetite to funders in one page?
Do staff trust internal reporting mechanisms?
Are board papers pre-empting risks—or just reacting?
Conclusion: Governance as a catalyst
“In turbulence, the best leaders don’t hide—they use governance as a compass.” —NCVO (2022)
Good governance is not about avoiding risk—it is about navigating it with purpose, intelligence, and integrity. For charities and public bodies facing high-stakes decisions with limited resources, this shift is essential.
- Prioritise one short-term action (e.g. policy review).
- Schedule a board skills audit within 90 days.
- Contact King Advisory for sector-specific support (e.g. health sector regulatory mapping, trustee training).
References
Charity Commission (2024) – Updated Guidance on Trustee Duties and Risk
Equality and Human Rights Commission – Public Sector Equality Duty Guidance (2023)
ICO – AI and Data Protection Toolkit for the Public Sector (2023)
National Audit Office (2023) – Principles of Effective Governance for Public Sector Leaders
NCVO – Governance Roundtable: Leadership in Uncertainty (2022)
King Advisory 
Leave a comment