Psychological safety is about enabling people to contribute without fear—of humiliation, retaliation, judgement or exclusion. In all workplaces it should not be considered optional. It must be foundational from the perspective of the employer duty of care and to safeguard health and safety.
For organisations serious about duty of care, equity, leadership, or human rights, psychological safety must be understood as a cultural infrastructure. This tool outlines practical ways to build, measure, and sustain psychological safety across teams and systems.
Why it matters
- Without it, inclusion strategies fail.
- Mistakes go unspoken until they escalate.
- The most marginalised voices stay silent—then leave.
- Innovation and learning stagnate.
- Risk of litigation rise due to health and safety violations.
Remember:
- Psychological safety is a shared condition, not an individual mindset.
- It is only real when experienced by those with the least structural and formalised power.
- It must be embedded in structures—not just behaviour. For example, you may have the most robust zero tolerance for discrimination policy, but do your workforce feel psychologically safe enough to use it?
Tool: Embedding psychological safety in practice
| Action Area | What to Do | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic Intent | Define psychological safety in internal policies and leadership frameworks. Make it a core behaviour in leadership models, team charters, and governance codes. | Signals that this is a strategic priority, not a personal preference. |
| Visible Leadership | Leaders should admit uncertainty, ask for feedback, model active listening, and thank challenge. Normalise not knowing. | Psychological safety is shaped by what people observe, not what they’re told. |
| Structures & Systems | Build in anonymous feedback routes, regular team reflections, after-action reviews, and psychologically safe induction and onboarding. | Systems reinforce culture. Without structure, safety is accidental or patchy. |
| Power Awareness | Audit whose voices are heard and whose aren’t. Ensure equity audits, exit interviews, and engagement data are disaggregated. | Safety doesn’t exist if it’s only felt by those with privilege or seniority. |
| Learning & Repair | Create processes for conflict resolution, collective learning after mistakes, and transparent recovery after breaches of safety. | Psychological safety is not permanent. It needs maintenance and repair. |
| Accountability | Psychological safety should be assessed in performance reviews, 360 feedback, and senior leadership metrics. | If no one is responsible, no one is accountable. |
| Team Practice | Use opening rounds, check-ins, and agreed team norms. Encourage disagreement. Celebrate useful challenge. | Teams build safety together. It needs rehearsal and reinforcement. |
You can use this tool to assess your culture at organisational and team levels. You can also use it as an employee to assess how you feel about your workplace. What are the core signifiers that you can see? Are psychological safety mechanisms performative or do people feel they can use them? How would you improve on the tool above? This isn’t a finished product—it’s a starting point. One that asks: if safety isn’t being felt, what’s really being built?
Leave a comment