About

King Advisory: Law, Psychology and Strategy

All content provided by King Advisory is for general information and learning purposes only. While developed using expert knowledge and sector experience, these resources are not formally endorsed or commissioned by any public body or organisation. Users are encouraged to apply professional judgement and seek specific advice for local application.

King Advisory is an independent, not-for-profit advisory platform committed to equality and human rights. We operate at the intersection of law, psychology and strategy, offering thought leadership and implementable resources for navigating complexity. Our aim is to help people and organisations drive human rights-based, ethical and sustainable improvement without jargon, judgement or hierarchy.

Our resources are independently developed, offered freely and grounded in evidence and decades of collaborative research and practice across multiple business and industry sectors. The resources are offered to support decision-makers in developing their own reflections and actions in navigating risk, compliance, and transformation while centring human rights, ethics and accountability.

We want to end the gatekeeping of information that can improve lives, outcomes, organisations and systems. We hold that change starts with courage, practical insight, and spaces that allow for honest challenge without judgement. That’s why every opinion piece, guide, briefing, and tool we create is rooted in global principles of equality, human rights, justice, inclusion, fairness and dignity.

Editorial principles

King Advisory publishes resources and commentary in line with the following values:

1. Independence
All content is developed without influence from funders, institutions or political bodies. We are not paid to publish, promote, or endorse any organisation.

2. Evidence led
Analysis is grounded in legal frameworks, ethical theory, and applied research. We draw on publicly available documents, credible academic work, qualitative interviews, data and professional experience to inform our conclusions.

3. Public interest focus
We publish to promote accountability, advance human rights, and improve systems and structures; not to attack individuals or inflame controversy. Our lens is human rights-based, systemic and focused on continous improvement of outcomes for people everywhere.

4. Constructive critique
We challenge where needed, but always offer practical alternatives. Our approach is rooted in integrity, knowledge-seeking and fairness, not blame.

5. Transparency
We make our methodologies, sources and intentions clear. Where interpretation is involved, we state it. Where limits exist, we acknowledge them.

6. Human rights and justice first
We align with global human rights frameworks and advocate for equitable outcomes, lawful systems and accountable decision-making.